Degenerative Disc Disease Isn't Really a Disease: A Clyde North Chiropractor on What Your Scan Actually Means
There's a sentence I hear almost every week in my clinic.
"The doctor said it's just wear and tear. It's my age. There's nothing that can be done."
People say it flatly. Like a verdict they've already accepted. They hand me a scan report with the words "degenerative disc disease" on it. Somewhere along the way, they decided their spine is simply running out of road.
I understand why. The word "disease" is frightening. The word "degenerative" sounds like a one-way street. Put them together and it reads like a diagnosis you just have to live with.
But here's what the research actually says. Degeneration isn't a disease. It isn't caused mainly by wear and tear. And it's found in enormous numbers of people who have no pain at all.
This isn't an article telling you to accept it and manage the symptoms. This is the conversation I have when someone wants to understand what that scan report really means.
What "degenerative disc disease" actually describes
Let's start with the name, because it causes more harm than almost anything else in spinal healthcare.
Degenerative disc disease isn't a disease in the way people assume. It's a description of what a disc looks like on imaging. The disc has lost some height, some water content, or some of its normal structure.
That's it. It's a finding, not a condition.
And it's extraordinarily common. A systematic review of imaging in over 3,000 people with no back pain at all found disc degeneration in 37% of completely pain-free 20-year-olds. By age 80, that number rose to 96%.
Read that again. Nearly every pain-free 80-year-old has disc degeneration on imaging.
A separate population study of 975 people found disc degeneration in 71% of men and 77% of women under 50. In people over 50, it was present in more than 90% of both.
So when a scan shows degeneration, it tells you that you have a spine that has been alive for a while. It doesn't tell you why you're in pain.
The part that undercuts the whole "wear and tear" story
Here's where it gets genuinely interesting.
For decades, the assumption was that disc degeneration came from repetitive loading. Years of bending, lifting, and sitting slowly grinding the discs down. Wear and tear, essentially.
That explanation has been seriously challenged. The same research review notes that family and twin studies tell a different story. They suggest disc degeneration is determined largely by genetics, with environment playing an important but secondary role.
In other words, how much degeneration shows on your scan has a lot to do with the parents you were born to. Not just the job you've worked or the years you've clocked up.
This matters for one specific reason. If degeneration were purely about accumulated damage, then everyone with the same mileage would look the same on imaging. They don't. And people with nearly identical scans can have wildly different levels of pain.
Which raises the real question. If degeneration is this common, this genetic, and this often painless, why does it hurt for some people and not others?
The tyre analogy I use in clinic
Every tyre wears down. That's not a defect. It's what tyres do.
But put two cars side by side with the same age and the same kilometres, and the tyres can look completely different. One wears evenly across the tread. The other is bald on the inside edge while the outside still looks new.
The difference isn't age. It's alignment.
When the wheel alignment is out, the load stops being shared evenly. One edge takes punishment it was never designed to take. That tyre doesn't just wear. It wears unevenly, and it wears faster, and it fails earlier.
Your discs work the same way. Degeneration spread evenly across a well-aligned spine is usually quiet. Degeneration concentrated at one or two levels, because the load is being funnelled there, is a different story entirely.
That's the part almost nobody measures.
What actually drives the load
Your spine has natural curves. One in the neck, one in the mid-back, one in the lower back. Those curves exist so load spreads across many segments instead of concentrating in a few.
When those curves flatten or reverse, the load redistributes. Specific levels start absorbing more force than they were built for.
The research backs this up. A meta-analysis of 13 studies found a strong link between a reduced lower back curve and lower back pain. And a study on the neck found that loss of the cervical curve was present in roughly 42% of people with neck pain. Critically, the degree of curve loss was directly linked to how quickly the discs wore out.
That last finding is the whole point. Curve loss doesn't just sit alongside degeneration. It appears to accelerate it.
So the useful question was never "do I have degeneration?" Almost everyone does eventually. The useful question is: "is the load going through my spine distributed properly, or is it being concentrated somewhere?"
Why "nothing can be done" is the wrong conclusion
I want to be careful and honest here.
You can't reverse a degenerated disc back to the disc you had at twenty. Nobody can. Any practitioner promising that is setting unrealistic expectations.
But that isn't the same as nothing being possible.
Degeneration is the outcome. Load distribution is the input. You can't undo the outcome, but you can change the input. And changing the input changes what happens from here.
A review of controlled trials using Chiropractic BioPhysics methods found the lower back curve increased by 7 to 11 degrees over 10 to 12 weeks. Most groups held that correction at the six-month check.
For the neck, a trial that followed patients for two full years found that those receiving cervical traction increased their neck curve and kept it at both three months and two years. The control group showed no structural change at all.
The structure can change. That's measurable, published, and repeatable. Results vary between people, and this approach isn't right for every presentation. But "nothing can be done" isn't supported by the evidence.
What happens if you accept the verdict
This is the cost of the "it's just your age" explanation. It stops the investigation.
Someone accepts that their spine is simply wearing out. They stop looking for a cause. They manage the pain with medication and rest, and they wait for it to get worse because they've been told that's the trajectory.
Meanwhile the thing actually driving the uneven load, the postural change or curve loss, continues doing exactly what it's been doing. The joints stiffen further. The surrounding muscles fatigue from compensating. And the nervous system, after months or years of persistent pain signals, becomes more sensitive to them.
That's the real risk. Not the degeneration itself, which is often silent. The risk is accepting an explanation that ends the search before anyone has measured what's actually happening.
The encouraging flip side is that the earlier the load distribution is addressed, the more room there is to work with. You can read more about how disc injuries develop and what we look for.
One thing you can check today
Pull out your scan report. Not the images, the written report.
Look for whether it mentions degeneration at one or two specific levels, or whether it describes generalised changes across the whole spine.
If the degeneration is concentrated at one or two levels, that's a meaningful clue. It suggests load is being funnelled somewhere rather than shared. Generalised, even changes across many levels look much more like normal ageing.
This isn't a diagnosis, and a report alone can't tell you what's driving your pain. But it's a far better question to walk into an assessment with than "how bad is it?"
The better question is: "why here, and why these levels?"
Where to start: degenerative disc disease in Clyde North
If you've been told your scan shows degeneration and that nothing can be done, get a second opinion. Not on the symptoms. On the structure.
That's what our ClearSpine Pain Assessment is built for. We perform five targeted tests designed to find what's actually driving your symptoms. They show where the load is concentrating and what the path forward looks like.
Assessing degenerative disc disease in Clyde North starts with measuring the alignment, not just naming the finding.
I see people from across Melbourne's southeast, including Berwick, Cranbourne, Narre Warren, Officer and Beaconsfield, here at the clinic in Clyde North.
If you're ready to understand what your scan actually means, book your ClearSpine Pain Assessment or call us on (03) 5915 9895.
Degeneration isn't your sentence. It's your starting point.
(An important note: sudden severe back pain after trauma, loss of bladder or bowel control, or rapidly spreading numbness or weakness are emergencies. Don't book an appointment. Go to emergency or call 000 immediately.)
Dr. Ashley Cherrett (BAppSc(Chiro), BHlthSc) is the principal chiropractor and owner of Cherrett Chiropractic in Clyde North, Melbourne. He practises using the Chiropractic BioPhysics (CBP) technique, a structured, evidence-based approach to spinal correction. This article is educational and does not constitute medical advice. Individual results vary, and all care is based on individual assessment.
Comments